Hello Suzie Dunn,
Yes I do understand you have titles that involve AUTHORITY however you must understand it is not a permission slip to lack leadership by accessing my trauma and republishing it without my consent while being bias, rude and lacking following your own values.
Your decisions to have an extreme level of entitlement to my experience, traumas, story, court case and human rights tribunal by potentially accessing it without my consent, publishing it without mu consent as well as escalating the abuse, hate speech and trauma due to your own bias and stigma you refuse to put to the side as a professional while forcefully controlling others to be regulated, follow coercive controlling demands, or defaming them to harm them is not acceptable or ethical.
Since you have already got the case somehow that I never ethically or legally provided you access to nor did I consent to you must already be aware of the following:
1) I faced over 4 years of discrimration, bias, hate speech, abuse, and cooperate hate crimes leading to over 47,500$ in economic damages while being left for my own death with no healthcare for my liver, no speiaal food for my health, no meds, no support and no secure housing while being tormented by a human trafficking gang by receiving rape and death threats. Saint Mary's University took ZERO allegations seriously and was only interested in money and looking nice. I had evidence of claims and they would punish me severely to maintain their buissness sales and image while having a sickening disregard for human life.
2) All complaints and allegations were not taken seriously, investigated and I was always met with more abuse and harm to silence me.
3) My main purpurtrator Rachel who states she is a lawyer is frauding her title and it is her fake legal claims that everyone believed that led to my wrongful punishments which was a contradictory outcome.
4) Your coworker who works in the same exact department as your who may have breached my confidentiality who's name is David Fraser who may have taken the case as a conflict of interest for Philip Fraser and they may be brothers more likley then not wrote his own decision letter for the hearing while posing as the "defence lawyer for the 2 guilty and remorseless professors that the somehow found in their personal lives"
5) The claims about suicidal ideation were because my main purpurtrator would deliberately escalate suicidal ideation with intent. I have a pile of evidence of this by using my psychic gifts to predict specific acts of abuse and hate speech, emailing her like a causanary tale warning not to commit and while stating it would cause anxiety and suicidal ideation, which was ALWAYS followed by her doing the exact illegal act of hate speech to deliberatly cause harm very similar to nurses with munchausen syndrome by proxy who deliberately harm their patients while lying to ensure victims are never believed and all professionals will fall for the lies and made up stories. She would deliberety cause the symptom and I have the evidence to prove it. All claims about this topic are about her doing this. NEVER and I repeat NEVER were any of them made for your stigmatizing allegation of when people self harm after someone disagrees with them they are abusive and playing with your feelings. Thank you for allowing me to clarify this detail to ensure you are aware of the details to prevent further speculation from you and other professionals who have all clearly demonstrated ZERO care for my experience as a victim.
Since you have demonstrated an enormous amount of curiosity for my experience and trauma I never provided you access to I would appreciate it if you would answer the following questions:
1) Did David Fraser breech my confidentiality to you?
2) Who was your case study about in your video with Uottawa about AI and politics? Did you access it in an ethical and legal manner? Did you get informed consent? Was it provided to you voluntary by the victim? Listening to your speech and comments about the "terminator approach" while you more likley then not never demonstrated a teeny tiny amount of care for that victim was abusive, bullying, inhumane and sickening to witness. Perhaps that victim was indigenous and recently lost multiple family member to the cultural and social genecide that is in fact encouraged by professional that have the same values as you. The "terminator approach" value that includes the idea that professionals can abuse victims and victims can't speak about it and if they do you'll find a way to terminate and regulate it to cover up for them.
3) Who was your case study about in your video with The Diversity Institute about Online Harms? Did you access it in an ethical and legal manner? Did you get informed consent? Did you take a moment to ask if the victims was okay or demonstrate even the slightest bit of care for the experience? Did you take a victim who stated that they faced hate speech and hate crimes and title them purpurtrator to abuse and bully them to cover up for the professionals? I found it incredibly abusive and disturbing to witness you take that content about abuse, hate speech and hate crimes and sit back remorseless not caring about the victim by stating the "victim NEEDED to learn ONLINE BEHAVIOUR TEACHINGS" I found it to be incredibly heartless and sickening to witness while you hold the titles you do as a professional. To be clear victims who face severe ABUSE and HATE SPEECH and HATE CRIMES who are abused for reporting it DONT need to be taught your behaviour teachings. You need to be taught how to have empathy and compassion for women who are low income who have no other option to stand up for themselves to prevent their own death.
4) Who was your case study about in your article titled young people need more support to deal with online harms through the conversation? Did you access it in an ethical and legal manner? Did you get informed consent? Did you take a moment to ask if the victims was okay or demonstrate even the slightest bit of care for the experience? Are you defaming victims of having sexist double standards to abuse and bully them because you view women living in poverty as punching bags who deserve nothing but abuse while being left for their own death because you lack empathy and care the that EXTREME extent? Why do you feel the need to tell victims who have lost over 47,500$ in fraud, been denied healthcare for their liver, their meds, housing and food that they DESERVED TO FACE IT BECAUSE THEY STOOD UP TO THE ABUSE AND HARM THAT ALMOST KILLED THEM? What part of you lacks empathy and care to the disturbing extent that you are mentally capable of publishing that? I would never imagine telling a victim that if they counter abuse, hate speech and hate crimes they deserve to be denied all resources for their survival. Why do you think that if poor women try to prevent being abused they deserve being denied access to power? Did you publish this particular paragraph to target a particular victim by chance?
5) Who was your case study about in your CBC interview about how victims are not getting the hep they need? Did you access it in an ethical and legal manner? Did you get informed consent? Victims don't want to tell you what apps they are using because you are an abusive bully who will likey look them up and gossip and slander their reputation without their consent and ruin their reputation while telling them they deserved it to be outright malicious to ensure you can maintain your own image of caring about diversity and equality when you have an inability to have empathy for women who are low income, lack resources, have bad grammar and trauma. Victims navigate their traumas alone and not supported because every single resources available to them abused them, failed them and stigmatized them so they have NO option other then to be alone with their psychic religious practices to nagavagte the malicious and outrageous professionals who pose as diversity and equality experts. Our novel experiences are caused by professionals who discriminate and refuse to stop and have childish tantrums if they are held accountable by demanding suspensions to ensure they never need to stop. You accept and encourage their lack of ethics which in fact is correlating to the novel experiences victims are forced to endure. The difference between experimentation and exploitation is income and intersectionality. When a victim is forced to endure prolonged discrimration that you contribute to yourself they are actually more likley to be explored as you sit back remorseless allowing the factors that led to their reality escalate. You biggest research question is why don't young adults tell an older adult what is transpiring. The answer is every single real allegation was met with severe and extreme abuse while all professionals lied to make themselves look nice while stigmatizing me severely. Therefore I am not comfortable opening up to older adults who promote abuse, stigma, hate and inequality while posing as the opposite. YES this means young people would in fact stay in abusive and awful situation than have to face an oppressive system you promote through your own bias and hate.
6) I provided you with a review in LEAF due to the multiple publications about my legal case and trauma you have accessed without my consent and published while speculating in a heartless rude and degrading manner. I was very clear about 2 things I wanted you to STOP which was religious/psychic discmriation by speculating about hacking security cameras and stigma towards mental health by stating people with mental health disorders are a danger. After receiving this you published both of those with exact details that I asked you not to. I am empathetic to mistakes but your deliberate refusal to stop and obession with targeting me with your abusive hate speech is a major concern.
1) To be clear you are the professional who has accessed a victims case and trauma without their consent as well as made multiple publications about it which were abusive, bullying and inhumane. The fact that the victims found them is not you being targeted.
2) My purpurtrator is frauding her lawyer title. Her legal claims are not real and she is escalating harm towards me to abuse me while desperately trying to get herself out of trouble. She has never needed a restraining order nor has one been applied for or approved by a judge. You don't need to have pity for how you have published my case which included her and me and I gave you a review about your severe lack of ethics by not getting my consent so I must be PUNISHED by indirectly writing about it in the LEAF review. Your enabling her criminal behaviour and people pleasing by advocating for her needing indirect communications from me to be punished in the restraining order she never had, never needed with her fake legal claims with her frauded lawyer title.
Thank you so much for the fantastic opportunity to clarify information with you in regards to my experience, trauma and legal case you have accessed and published without my consent with a stigmatizing rude lens which hurt my feelings. I thought your curiosity would appreciate the the clarity to FACTUAL INFORMATION opposed to the frauded lawyer title from Rachel, fake legal claims and lies you have been told so far.
I would very much appreciate and value if you would use this as a learning experience for your future work in the field to ensure no more out of control complex situations occur like this again. It has been several months on your ongoing deformation, disinformation and harassment. I never consented to any of it nor will I ever consent to it.
I wish you the best of luck in your career and curious projects. However due to your bias, never getting my consent and name calling I do not want to take part in your curiosity about my life.
Thank you for your entitlement and curiosity about my experience. However you must understand your titles of "authority" do not give you the permission slip to not be held accountable for your lack of ethics. Your authority titles do not FORCE my consent to your forcefully controlling a demand to get my legal case in a unethical manner, publish it with bias and hate and then fake care to offer fake support to judge my personal life and applications I use. Having power is about maintaining the values you speak of including consent, not being abusive, and being caring. You speak and demand others to do this but completly neglect to be it. Therefore your power isn't being maintained and people are less likely to take you seriously even the slightest bit.
You and your friends have broken my trust severely and I would appreciate the following from you:
1) Stop forcefully accessing my trauma without my concent
2) Stop making multiple publications about it with a bias and rude lens
3) Don't escalate anymore hate I am a psychic and you will not successfully fool me with your bullshit, childish act outs and games. Research remote viewing psychics, Russel Targeted and magic religious rituals if you feel the need to be curious about it.
I will be busy creating a spectacular life for myself while being as healthy as possible. Don't be a barrier to my dreams, goals and potential anymore then what you have with your rude and cruel judgements and forced consent due to your illusion of your authority title while neglecting to honour your values.
Good luck with your curiosity and career.
Ver más >