They get a star because they don't have negative values for grading. The teachers are divided into those who are great and the majority who are not good at all.The one who is in fundamental programming is just trying to fail you.The quality of learning is low, the level of english is not suitable at all.He is trying to do his exams fast but he has no quality to his methods of teaching.Job wise to provide high standards in every lessons he is lazy and therefore gives those attributions to the teacher assistants.The program is ment to be as it should in normal universities, 5 year courses but is crammed into 3years.The courses are evaluated every semester and they don't provide stability.From internal sources the program was changed 6 times in the last year, ...what is your opinion about that? It is common practice to start a course and be handed the theory (if you get some at all )after you have went through the whole course content.I understand the Swedish learning system is made so that the student is encouraged to learn on his/her own but i believe that it should be a basic of information given at the very beginning and start from there.In the information area regarding administration is also limited the student learns as it goes along in the system.As a positive note the university is giving its students some computers to lone and at the end of their studied have the option to buy them.
The level of english is execrable at the university in my opinion all the teachers should present a Cambridge proficiency certificate if they plan to teach in english .
iAgora provides university reviews and ratings by international graduates, Erasmus and exchange students. International rankings and admission details to graduate programmes like masters, MSc, MBAs and summer courses at Högskolan i Kristianstad and other business schools and universities.